Legarda says 12 votes not enough to install Gatchalian as acting Senate chief

The arithmetic behind Sen. Sherwin Gatchalian’s elevation to acting Senate president falls short of what the charter demands, Sen. Loren Legarda argued, casting doubt on whether the chamber’s reshuffled leadership can lawfully exercise its functions.

Her objection turns on a single number. With 24 senators making up the chamber, a working majority requires 13, yet only 12 lawmakers were on hand when the new leadership was seated. “By the fact that the senators present did not have 13 votes, they could not validly elect a Senate president or authorize any senator to act as Senate president,” Legarda said, adding that no senator can validly act in the post “on the strength of only 12 votes.”

Gatchalian, who took over the Senate president pro tempore role that Legarda had held, was tapped to serve as acting Senate president while Alan Peter Cayetano remains away from the chamber. The shift in control came after the bloc once treated as the minority gained the upper hand, a turn driven partly by Sen. Francis “Chiz” Escudero, who had previously sided with Legarda’s group before crossing over and leaving that camp with 10 members.

Legarda stressed that lawmakers who happen to be absent should not see their standing diminished as a result. “The temporary absence of some members should not become a reason to lower their representation or weaken the mandate of the people who elected them,” she said.

A senator’s seat, by her reckoning, stays intact until a specific legal trigger removes it. “Until there is a vacancy, resignation, expulsion, final disqualification, or other legal basis recognized by law, their seats remain part of the Senate’s full membership,” she said.

Pressing the point of constitutional fidelity, Legarda warned that actions taken without the required headcount cannot stand. “We remain firm in our respect for the Constitution. Any proceeding conducted without the constitutionally required quorum raises serious questions of validity and cannot be recognized as consistent with the clear mandate of the Constitution,” she said.