The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Davao City chapter stood firm on its decision to honor former President Rodrigo Duterte with the Golden Pillar of Law Award, emphasizing that the recognition was based strictly on professional qualifications rather than political affiliation.
In a statement released Wednesday, IBP Davao clarified that the award “does not serve as an endorsement of political acts or personal ideologies.” Instead, it is conferred solely on lawyers who meet the standards of “professional longevity and standing” outlined in the organization’s by-laws.
The group’s explanation came after several lawyers and human rights advocates condemned the recognition, citing Duterte’s ongoing cases before the International Criminal Court related to his anti-drug campaign.
IBP Davao maintained that members of the legal profession must “rise above biases” and uphold the principle that “judgment must rest on evidence and final conviction, not mere perception.” It also reminded the public that “every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.”
Citing a memorandum from IBP national president Allan Panolong dated August 20, the Davao chapter said the Golden Pillar of Law Award is reserved for lawyers with at least 50 years in the practice of law, who remain in good standing, and who have not been convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude or subjected to disciplinary action.
According to the chapter, Duterte “fully meets each criterion,” as do all other recipients recognized across the country under the same guidelines.
